By Luc Sala 14 nov 2011
For those familiar with the I Ching, the book of changes, the notion that the I Ching is an antenna for the future is an unusual, but acceptable description. The I Ching is used as a divination tool and consulted to indicate the future, often related to specific questions or actions and is also decribed as a hypercommunication tool.
If the I Ching is an antenna for the future, somehow working outside our notion and realm of linear unidirectional time and causality, but obviously effective as it has been around a few thousand years, what about Tarot, dowsing and clairvoyance or prescience? Is the future, or access to dimensions outside our “normal” space-time, a more basic phenomenon than we assume, is an awareness of the future not part of the whole of evolution. Do we know where we are going, but need to use tools like the I Ching to bring it to a conscious level? Does a seed know where it is going and does some kind of awareness of it’s future explains how it will evolve? Is the whole of evolution not a process of “remembering” the future, far more practical that Teilhard de Chardin’s teleological notion of a far away divine goal? And what about DNA? Epigenetics indicate that in the development of a species and an individual many “choices” are made, related to the environment, but how to explain that the seed becomes a specific plant. Sheldrake’s theory of morphogenetic fields offers a limited explanation, and certainly ties in with the notion that everything influences everything, but doesn’t explain why a species or individual develops as it does. Now if we see DNA also as an antenna of or towards the future and in that sense as a crucial receptacle and source of guidance for life-forms to know where to go and how to choose from the environmental factors?
DNA is, according to many, also a hypercommunication medium. Many scientists and researchers have noted the correlation with I Ching and other divination and time-related tools and artefacts. Jose Arguelles for example noted the correlation of 64 rune symbols to the 64 hexagrams of the I Ching and to the 64 codons of DNA. Russian researchers see DNA as a biological Internet, especially the 90% of "junk DNA" is important, as it follows similar rules as all our human languages in syntax, semantics and grammar. So human languages did not appear coincidentally but are a reflection of our inherent DNA. According to them, our DNA is not only responsible for the construction of our body, but also serves as data storage and in communication. Esoteric and spiritual teachers have known for ages that our body is programmable by language, words and thought, given the right frequency etc. and here age-old methods come into play, as relaxation and deepper levels of consciousness come into play. Again DNA seems to play a role in the hypercommunication, there are effects like the socalled Phantom DNA effect that seem to point at energy fields that exist in another dimension but can be traced in normal time-space. Hypercommunication is like the morphogenetic fields or the observer in quantum-physics and I believe transcend also time, in other worlds allows dealing with past and future, wormhole connectivity. The Russian researchers use the example of insect hive communication (when the queen is taken waya but alive, the hive lives, when she is dead the workers die) when to illustrate the effectiveness of hypercommunication, much in the same way Sheldrake illustrated his thesis. They also claim to be able to change DNA structures with relatively simple means like electromagnetic fields. This adapatbility of DNA is something Greg Braden also noticed, he reports DNA changes in human DNA. DNA repair is a hot topic is fringe-science and 2012 lore.
The idea, that we know (are aware of) the future, has dawned upon me as an explanation of many phenomena, in the magical realm but also in "scientific" physics. There are now many experiments that indicate that we actually perceive or know the future, sometimes just milliseconds before something happens, sometimes there is a body reaction faster than neurological transmission can explain, sometime observers react to pictures before they are randomly chosen from a series.
However, in a wider context, assuming that "any event is a function of not only observer, world state (observed) and past, but also of the future" is mathematically in line with modern physics, but goes against our notion of how unidirectional time-space works.
I believe, that we as humans have developed a strict unidirectional causal (ony the past influences the present) notion in our programmed personality layers, but can have access to a bidirectional causality in deeper layers of the self/inner child etc. In Mystical and trance states many do experience the future, become prophetic etc. In those states we can also influence the future (and past and present) and shape reality or at least the perception of reality/maya, but isn't that all we have access to anyway. So this brings maybe a new notion about magic and magical action, it the manipulation of reality outside of the normal arrowed time notion.
The implication of accepting our "knowledge" of the future has enormous implications, it explains evolution as "a remembrance of the future", the seed knows where it's going, the DNA is conforming to the future it "knows". In philosophy, this idea has no or scant supporters, only some teleological GOD-directed notion in Teilhard de Chardin, even time-obsessed Bergson never mentions the possibility that we know the future.
In magical practice, obviously our working base is that we can influence the future through thoughts and acts in the present. The magic (but in fact universal) Laws of resonance, attraction, polarity etc. all basically work outside unidirectional time, although frequency (sound, colour) is of course a very space-time concept. I believe we can also influence the past, and many psi-experiments prove we can influence the present, mostly if we can move into those layers of our psyche and existence that are not very ego-driven by means of trance, meditation or ritual concentration.
Ir. L. Sala
not entirely accidental, the following came to my attention and kind of illustrates my point
ref; Vernetzte Intelligenz (Networked Intelligence), Grazyna Gosar and Franz Bludorf
In an article by Grazyna Fosar and Franz Bludorf they refer to Russian research, indicating that the Human HUMAN DNA is a BIOLOGICAL INTERNET, there is eveidence of a new type of medicine in which DNA can be influenced and reprogrammed by words and frequencies WITHOUT cutting out and replacing single genes. Only 10% of our DNA is being used for building proteins. It is this subset of DNA that is of interest to western researchers and is being examined and categorized. The other 90% are considered “junk DNA.” but according to The Russian researchers, our DNA is not only responsible for the construction of our body but also serves as data storage and in communication. The Russian linguists found that the genetic code, especially in the apparently useless 90%, follows the same rules as all our human languages. To this end they compared the rules of syntax (the way in which words are put together to form phrases and sentences), semantics (the study of meaning in language forms) and the basic rules of grammar. They found that the alkalines of our DNA follow a regular grammar and do have set rules just like our languages. So human languages did not appear coincidentally but are a reflection of our inherent DNA.
The Russian biophysicist and molecular biologist Pjotr Garjajev and his colleagues also explored the vibrational behavior of the DNA.He stated: