What role did the pyramids play in dealing with celestial influences?
A letter to
Dr H. Wesselman, March 2008
I read your story about the pyramid experience http://www.greatmystery.org/newsletters/hank_kingschamber2.html and how you made some telepathic
contact with some star system, realising the pyramid maybe was some kind of
interstellar communication device.
Now I got the following notion about the relationship of the pyramid (but maybe
also of other ancient constructions, Stonehenge etc.) with our climate crisis,
which I believe is caused by a solar activity cycle.
The sun is dancing, shaking her ass in a distant love affair with some star
system out there (could be Sirius, Pleyads or
whatever, Hancocks theories indicate Sirius in the
past) and doing so in some kind of regular cycle, which looks like a mating
pattern. She is getting excited, as indicated by solar spot activity and as you
know, many believe she is about to peak with maybe desastrous
implications. In fact I believe, that this increased activity already started
already some 500 years ago, with the logical result of more crops, increased
wealth and then time and reserves to invest in art, technology etc., our socalled western civilisation is then a natural result of
increased solar activity, with earth responding like we are a petri scale in a laboratory, more warmth leads to more food
leads to more specialisation leads to more people and eventually peaks out. But for what purpose? To create a new and higher life form,
a new root race, a more conscious lifeform or just
some kind of superslaves?
I have a feeling that's exactly what this is all about,
the solar system is used and has been used as a breeding pit for increasingly
aware, intelligent beings. Seemingly not such a simple or an easy process, if
we realise that the solar system is like a purposeful built space laboratory,
with not only an energy source, but a very clever set of planets to shield and
mitigate the radiation/energy fields from the galaxy or even the whole cosmos. Astrology
after all is all about how the planets influence us (and the animals and nature
and earth in general) by changing/focusing the energy of the star systems
further away. The old people believed it was the star-astrology that really
mattered andI think that real change only occurs when
the planets kind of accidently leave an opening in
their defensive constellation.
It looks
like we are a life-laboratory on a galactic scale, seemingly limited to our
time-space continuum, but really part of a multidimensional web of energies,
communications, fields and purpose.
And if we
believe Sitchin and others this process of creating
new lifeforms has not been straightforward, had some
glitches, maybe some interference from again other forces, some aborted
attempts (Atlantis?).
Coming back
to the Pyramids, is it possible the King’s chamber was not the King’s chamber,
but the Queen’s? Meaning that it was the place where a woman could receive the
energy/force/DNA information necessary for a new step in human development, a
new root race, a new dynasty to guide us? Not only a communications hub, as
many people experience when inside the pyramid, but constructed to fertilize a
woman with a new program, a new DNA set, a new race of
evolved human beings. In many old civilizations we have the story of the virgin
mother, and of exceptional people being born and becoming leaders, kings,
prophets, pharao’s etc. Sometimes these people
disappear in the mist of times, sometimes they are inspiration for religions,
maybe sometimes they are just the forefathers of bloodlines carrying their
genes through the generations. And doesn’t it make sense that Mary was in
We know
that most old religions and cultures worshipped the sun, not only as the source
of energy, but as a force to reckon with, a force to be appaised,
the one that demanded sacrifice, the one that could destroy the earth if not
respected. The dance of the sun, her cyclical reign over earth was recognized,
charted and people like the Maya figured out, and we will know soon if they did
a good job, when this dance would come to a climax. Then were constructions
like the Pyramids, Stonehenge and older sacred sites maybe places to deal with
that mating need of the solar system, a place where virgins could be
fertilized, where the demi-gods, saviours, messiahs
or pharao’s were received, as an information exchange
with something out there, something far away in the stars. No physical mating,
but fertilization in a different, non-material form, pure information traveling interdimensionally or extradimensionally.
Now, what
could this mean for us, today. We are all aware of the
climate change, we know the world went through major cycles and cataclysms in
the past, and we are afraid, terror reigns, many people feel that something is
about to happen. Some of the old folks, like the Hopi’s, not only warn us, but
indicate that we might actually prevent the eschatological end-game. Might it,
that we have to understand the real purpose of the pyramids, create a modern
temple or construction to accommodate this exchange with what is out there and appaise the sun in that way? I offer this insight to the world, maybe someone will link it to other insights and see
the whole picture. It’s about time, the sun is about to shake us up otherwise.
Luc Sala,
What role did the pyramids play in dealing with celestial influences.?
By now we
have ample proof that the old eqyptians or whoever
built the great pyramid were well aware of how earth sits amidst not only
planets and the sun/moon, but amidst stars and the wider galaxy and especially
Sirius pops up as a major influence on the pyramid construction.
As we are,
according to Maya and many other cultures reckoning, facing a new solar crisis,
that might originate not from solar system influence, but rather from forces
outside the solar system, in our own galaxy or even beyond. Our solar system
seems to be subject to a cyclic pulse or even peak in energy exchange, as
manifested in solar storms etc. This may have devastating effects on the earth, with
global warming just as one of the things we notice , and it might be worthwhile to look at the
pyramids as a way the sages of old tried to deal with similar celestial
situations or threads. Maybe the pyramids were megaprojects
to deal with the energy (in whatever form or dimensional originin)
from the wider cosmos or specific star constellations, foton-belts
or other forces out there. Maybe the great pyramid(s), with marble or alabaster
outside, some say even gilded surfaces and inner corridors clearly aimed at
specific stars (Sirius) were energy tools to deal with those influences.
A recent
discovery about the construction of the pyramids out of a kind of
cement/concrete sheds new light on the level of technological finesse of the
builders. (L. Sala 06/07)
The Surprising Truth Behind the Construction of
the Great Pyramids
By
Sheila Berninger,
and Dorilona Rose
posted: 18 May 2007 09:42 am ET
This Behind the
Scenes article was provided to LiveScience in partnership with
the National Science Foundation.
"This is not my
day job." So begins Michel Barsoum as he
recounts his foray into the mysteries of the Great Pyramids of Egypt. As a well
respected researcher in the field of ceramics, Barsoum
never expected his career to take him down a path of history, archaeology, and
"political" science, with materials research mixed in.
As a distinguished professor in the Department of Materials Science and
Engineering at Drexel University, his daily routine consists mainly of teaching
students about ceramics, or performing research on a new class of materials,
the so-called MAX Phases, that he and his colleagues discovered in the 1990s.
These modern ceramics are machinable, thermal-shock
resistant, and are better conductors of heat and electricity than many
metals-making them potential candidates for use in
nuclear power plants, the automotive industry, jet engines, and a range of
other high-demand systems.
Then Barsoum received an unexpected phone call from Michael Carrell, a friend of a retired colleague of Barsoum, who called to chat with the Egyptian-born Barsoum about how much he knew of the mysteries surrounding
the building of the Great Pyramids of
Giza, the only remaining of the seven wonders of the ancient
world.
The widely accepted theory-that the pyramids were crafted of carved-out giant
limestone blocks that workers carried up ramps-had not only not been embraced
by everyone, but as important had quite a number of holes.
Burst out laughing
According to the
caller, the mysteries had actually been solved by Joseph Davidovits,
Director of the Geopolymer Institute in
"It was at this point in the conversation that I burst out laughing,"
says Barsoum. If the pyramids were indeed cast, he
says, someone should have proven it beyond a doubt by now, in this day and age,
with just a few hours of electron microscopy. It turned out that nobody had
completely proven the theory...yet.
"What started as a two-hour project turned into a five-year odyssey that I
undertook with one of my graduate students, Adrish Ganguly, and a colleague in France, Gilles Hug," Barsoum says.
A year and a half later, after extensive scanning electron microscope (SEM)
observations and other testing, Barsoum and his
research group finally began to draw some conclusions about the pyramids. They
found that the tiniest structures
within the inner and outer casing stones were indeed consistent with a reconstituted
limestone. The cement binding the limestone aggregate was either
silicon dioxide (the building block of quartz) or a calcium and magnesium-rich
silicate mineral.
The stones also had a high water content-unusual for the normally dry, natural
limestone found on the
The sample chemistries
the researchers found do not exist anywhere in nature. "Therefore,"
says Barsoum, "it's very improbable that the
outer and inner casing stones that we examined were chiseled from a natural
limestone block."
More startlingly, Barsoum and another of his graduate
students, Aaron Sakulich, recently discovered the
presence of silicon dioxide nanoscale spheres (with
diameters only billionths of a meter across) in one of the samples. This
discovery further confirms that these blocks are not natural limestone.
Generations misled
At the end of their
most recent paper reporting these findings, the researchers reflect that it is
"ironic, sublime and truly humbling" that this 4,500-year-old
limestone is so true to the original that it has misled generations of
Egyptologists and geologists and, "because the ancient Egyptians were the
original-albeit unknowing-nanotechnologists."
As if the scientific evidence isn't enough, Barsoum
has pointed out a number of common sense reasons why the pyramids were not
likely constructed entirely of chiseled limestone blocks.
Egyptologists are
consistently confronted by unanswered questions: How is it possible that some
of the blocks are so perfectly matched that not even a human hair can be
inserted between them? Why, despite the existence of millions of tons of stone,
carved presumably with copper chisels, has not one copper chisel ever been
found on the Giza Plateau? Although Barsoum's research has not answered all of these questions,
his work provides insight into some of the key questions. For example, it is
now more likely than not that the tops of the pyramids
are cast, as it would have been increasingly difficult to drag
the stones to the summit.
Also, casting would
explain why some of the stones fit so closely together. Still, as with all
great mysteries, not every aspect of the pyramids can be explained. How the
Egyptians hoisted 70-ton granite slabs halfway up the great pyramid remains as
mysterious as ever.
Why do the results of Barsoum's research matter most
today? Two words: earth cements.
"How energy intensive and/or complicated can a 4,500 year old technology
really be? The answer to both questions is not
very," Barsoum explains. "The basic raw
materials used for this early form of concrete-limestone, lime, and
diatomaceous earth-can be found virtually anywhere in the world," he adds.
"Replicating this method of construction would be cost effective, long
lasting, and much more environmentally friendly than the current building
material of choice: Portland cement that alone pumps roughly 6 billion tons of
CO2 annually into the atmosphere when it's manufactured."
"Ironically,"
says Barsoum, "this study of 4,500 year old
rocks is not about the past, but about the future."
